There are many supporters of net neutrality and many critics, and both sides include large and influential companies. Those in support of net neutrality include Google, Yahoo, Microsoft, librarians and many liberals. Such supporters feel that the internet has always worked as it is and there is no need to change it. Other arguments are that net neutrality prevents monopolies from forming and that ending net neutrality would harm both small sites and consumers. Those against net neutrality are AT&T, Sprint, libertarian groups and pro-free market groups. They believe that the internet needs to change as the services it provides (such as video) are changing and that such services should have a higher priority. Also, they feel that net neutrality prevents innovation and investment.
In my opinion, net neutrality is definately a positive thing and I feel that it is crucial that the internet stays how it is now and always has been. The government says that the phone is a necessecary service and therefore it should be provided to everyone while the cable company is not a necessity and should be treated differently, as an "information" network. While the television is purely for entertainment, the internet is used for so much more in this day and age. In fact, I feel that the internet is becoming just as much of a necessity as the phone and it should therefore be provided to consumers as such. Also, one of the greatest things about the internet is that anyone can make a sight if they have a good idea and it can become popular and thriving, big companies do not have the upper hand in this regard. The internet has always worked so well and I believe that it would be a huge mistake to change it now.